In a study published in the journal Social Forces, scientists from the Ohio State University and the University of Texas at Austin found that neighborhoods with more dogs had lower rates of homicide, robbery and, to a lesser extent, aggravated assaults compared to areas with fewer dogs, at least when residents also had high levels of trust in each other.

Pinchak et al. offer suggestive evidence of crime deterrent benefits of local street monitoring and dog presence and call attention to the contribution of pets to other facets of neighborhood social organization. Image credit: Marta Reinartz.

Pinchak et al. offer suggestive evidence of crime deterrent benefits of local street monitoring and dog presence and call attention to the contribution of pets to other facets of neighborhood social organization. Image credit: Marta Reinartz.

“Sociologists have long theorized that a combination of mutual trust and local surveillance among residents of a neighborhood can deter criminals,” said co-author Professor Christopher Browning, a researcher in the Department of Sociology and the Institute for Population Research at the Ohio State University.

“But there hasn’t been a good measure of how residents provide surveillance of neighborhood streets.”

“We thought that dog walking probably captures that pretty well, which is one reason why we decided to do this study.”

“Our results suggest that people walking their dogs puts more ‘eyes on the street,’ which can discourage crime,” said first author Nicolo Pinchak, a doctoral student in the Department of Sociology and the Institute for Population Research at the Ohio State University.

“People walking their dogs are essentially patrolling their neighborhoods. They see when things are not right, and when there are suspect outsiders in the area. It can be a crime deterrent.”

For the study, the researchers looked at crime statistics from 2014 to 2016 for 595 census block groups in the Columbus area, Ohio.

They obtained survey data from a marketing firm that asked Columbus residents in 2013 if they had a dog in their household.

Finally, they used data from the Adolescent Health and Development in Context study to measure trust in individual neighborhoods.

As part of that study, residents were asked to rate how much they agreed that ‘people on the streets can be trusted’ in their neighborhoods.

“Research has shown that trust among neighbors is an important part of deterring crime, because it suggests residents will help each other when facing a threat and have a sense of collective efficacy that they can have a positive impact on their area,” Pinchak said.

“Our results showed, as expected, that neighborhoods with high levels of trust had lower levels of homicide, robbery and aggravated assaults when compared to neighborhoods with low levels of trust.”

“But among high-trust neighborhoods, those with high concentrations of dogs showed an additional drop in crime compared to those with low concentrations of dogs.”

Among the high-trust neighborhoods, neighborhoods high in dog concentration had about two-thirds the robbery rates of those low in dog concentration and about half the homicide rates.

“It really has to do with the dog walking. Trust doesn’t help neighborhoods as much if you don’t have people out there on the streets noticing what is going on. That’s what dog walking does,” Pinchak said.

“And that’s why dogs have a crime-fighting advantage over cats and other pets that don’t need walking.”

“When people are out walking their dogs, they have conversations, they pet each other’s dogs. Sometimes they know the dog’s name and not even the owners. They learn what’s going on and can spot potential problems.”

The results showed that the trust and dog-walking combination helped reduce street crimes: those crimes like homicides and robberies that tend to occur in public locations, including streets and sidewalks.

“We found that more dogs in a neighborhood was also related to fewer property crimes, like burglaries, irrespective of how much residents trust each other,” Pinchak said.

“That’s because barking and visible dogs can keep criminals away from buildings where the dogs are found — and neighborhood trust and surveillance is not needed as a factor, as it is in street crimes.”

The protective effect of dogs and trust was found even when a wide range of other factors related to crime was taken into account, including the proportion of young males in the neighborhood, residential instability and socioeconomic status.

Overall, the results suggest that it is beneficial to have a lot of trust in your neighbors to prevent crime – particularly if you add a lot of dogs and dog walkers.

“There has already been a lot of research that shows dogs are good for the health and well-being of their human companions. Our study adds another reason why dogs are good for us,” Pinchak said.

_____

Nicolo P. Pinchak et al. Paws on the Street: Neighborhood-Level Concentration of Households with Dogs and Urban Crime. Social Forces, published online June 25, 2022; doi: 10.1093/sf/soac059

Read More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *